This picture, 68KB |
||
|
|
||
|
In a seismic Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) of a Nuclear
Power Plant (NPP), the reliabilities of many safety systems are calculated
at various intensity levels of seismic motion to evaluate their core
damage probability. Such safety systems consist of many components
such as pumps and valves which are often designed in a similar way.
When we estimate the failure probability of simultaneous failure of
two components installed on the same floor, we have to take account
of the fact that if one component fails, another component of the same
design is likely to fail; this tendency is called "correlation." Since
the safety systems of an NPP are composed of many redundant components
of similar design, consideration of correlation is quite important
in a seismic PSA. The correlation increases the occurrence probability of simultaneous failure of multiple components, which is expressed as an intersection of component failures, compared with the "no correlation" (independent) case as shown in Fig. 10-6. On the other hand, the correlation decreases the probability of system failure that is defined by the failure of at least one component in a series system, which is expressed as a union of component failures. A calculation method was developed in the Seismic Safety Margins Research Program (SSMRP) to consider the effect of correlation. However, this traditional method considers only the effect of correlation on the occurrence probability of the intersection of component failures, while system failure or core damage is actually expressed as an union of many intersections of component failures. A new calculation method using the Monte Carlo simulation was developed in JAERI; this method is capable of providing more rigorous results since it considers both effects as discussed above. A sensitivity study using the new method, which considers the effect of correlation on the occurrence probabilities of not only the intersection of components but also the union of components, has shown that the traditional method that originates from the SSMRP may give a significantly conservative estimate of core damage probability as shown in Fig. 10-7. |
Reference
T. Oikawa et al., Development of Systems Reliability Analysis Code SECOM-2 for Seismic PSA, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 62, 251 (1998). |
Select a topic in left column |
Persistent Quest-Research Activities 1999 Copyright(c)Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute |